Comments on: Book Review: The New Science of Getting Rich – Revised for the 21st Century by Wallce D. Wattles, Edited by Ruth L. Miller http://pjmommy.com/book-review-science-rich-revised-21st-century/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:49:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Amapemeats http://pjmommy.com/book-review-science-rich-revised-21st-century/comment-page-1/#comment-35425 Amapemeats Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:17:34 +0000 http://pjmommy.com/?p=654#comment-35425 thank you, guy thank you, guy

]]> By: Kathryn http://pjmommy.com/book-review-science-rich-revised-21st-century/comment-page-1/#comment-32516 Kathryn Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:10:14 +0000 http://pjmommy.com/?p=654#comment-32516 I much preferred the Wattles book to The Secret. Byrne's new age overtones of "think and it will come without any effort on your part" did not sit well with me. I am in the camp where with thought and action, anything is possible. I much preferred the Wattles book to The Secret. Byrne’s new age overtones of “think and it will come without any effort on your part” did not sit well with me. I am in the camp where with thought and action, anything is possible.

]]> By: Yvie http://pjmommy.com/book-review-science-rich-revised-21st-century/comment-page-1/#comment-32066 Yvie Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:48:00 +0000 http://pjmommy.com/?p=654#comment-32066 Hmmm...I have read Rhonda's take on the Law of attraction as well as the other teachers featured on the book. I would say that I have come into a better material than it is. :) Although Wallace has a point. I have another opinion of getting rich. It requires a little action but it requires your mind to focus on what you want---without doubting it. Boy, will you discover how things are so easy to come to you. Anyway, thanks for sharing that book. I also would like to recommend this: http://www.amazon.com/What-Love-Money-Will-Follow/dp/0440501601 Hmmm…I have read Rhonda’s take on the Law of attraction as well as the other teachers featured on the book. I would say that I have come into a better material than it is. :) Although Wallace has a point. I have another opinion of getting rich. It requires a little action but it requires your mind to focus on what you want—without doubting it. Boy, will you discover how things are so easy to come to you.

Anyway, thanks for sharing that book. I also would like to recommend this:

http://www.amazon.com/What-Love-Money-Will-Follow/dp/0440501601

]]> By: Book Review: The New Science of Getting Rich - Revised for the 21st Century by Wallce D. Wattles, Edited by Ruth L. Miller http://pjmommy.com/book-review-science-rich-revised-21st-century/comment-page-1/#comment-32065 Book Review: The New Science of Getting Rich - Revised for the 21st Century by Wallce D. Wattles, Edited by Ruth L. Miller Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:35:41 +0000 http://pjmommy.com/?p=654#comment-32065 [...] Free Campaign websites, Free Candidate Search engine, 24/7 elections and politics wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt At first, this book did not sit well with me. Why can’t we just leave a classic alone? It’s like movie colorization; if the film was made in black & white then for goodness sake let it be black & white. The original book is a classic and for good reason. In 1910 when Wallace D. Wattles wrote The Science of Getting Rich, legend has it that he wrote it for coalminers to better their financial situation. Whether or not that’s true, the writing in 1910 was much different from our 21st cent [...] [...] Free Campaign websites, Free Candidate Search engine, 24/7 elections and politics wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt At first, this book did not sit well with me. Why can’t we just leave a classic alone? It’s like movie colorization; if the film was made in black & white then for goodness sake let it be black & white. The original book is a classic and for good reason. In 1910 when Wallace D. Wattles wrote The Science of Getting Rich, legend has it that he wrote it for coalminers to better their financial situation. Whether or not that’s true, the writing in 1910 was much different from our 21st cent [...]

]]>